Re: Discrete vs. continuous

From: spk2wrt@phoenix.edc.org
Date: Tue Mar 21 2000 - 00:00:00 EST

  • Next message: spk2wrt@phoenix.edc.org: "RE: An inquiry about any workshops available."

    To the listserv,

    I welcome David's perspective and will let it speak for itself. There is
    one
    item he states in the first paragraph that I would like to clarify. He says

    that an "article" was removed from the spk2wrt website. He is referring to
    the "Update on continuous speech" which is not actually removed altogether,

    but is itself being updated. It was overlooked in our most recent review of

    the website in Nov., 1999, and will be posted again within a few weeks. It
    will recognize the advances and new possibilities of the most recent
    continuous speech products, but will continue to caution about the
    developmental and speech processing issues in continuous speech technology.

    As you can see, David takes issue with even this modified position, as do
    several others who are active in implementation of speech recognition for
    school-age children. I welcome this discussion of the relative merits of
    discrete vs. continuous, and I hope that anyone with experience in both
    technologies will weigh in on this discussion. I hope we can all learn from

    the discussion.

    Bob Follansbee
    Co-Director, Speaking to Write Project

    In a message dated 3/16/00 4:34:18 PM Eastern Standard Time,
    spk2wrt@phoenix.edc.org writes:

    > Last month I was forwarded an article comparing continuous speech
    > recognition with discrete speech. In the statement Dr. Bob Follansbee
    > suggests that discrete speech recognition is often better than
    > continuous speech as an assistive technology method for people with
    > learning disabilities. I continue to hear this opinion from a variety
    > of respected sources, and strongly disagree with this argument. The
    > article was recently removed from the spk2wrt website following a series
    > of communications between myself and Bob. I have written a complete
    > rebuttal to this article, but it is too long for placement on this
    > forum. I believe it is important to discuss the reasons why continuous
    > speech recognition is better at all levels than discrete speech.

    ____________________________________________________________
    To post a message to the spk2wrt list, send your message to:
    spk2wrt@mail.edc.org. To reply to a message, simply use the reply button in
    your email program (do not change the subject line in any way). To access the
    spk2wrt archive containing a full list of all discussion threads to date, point
    your Web browser to: http://www.edc.org/spk2wrt/hypermail/. For questions about
    this list, please send a message to: spk2wrt@edc.org. For more information
    about the Speaking to Write project, please visit our Web site at:
    http://www.edc.org/spk2wrt



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 21 2000 - 10:12:01 EST